NEWS FEEDS: West button | Colorado button | Idaho button | Montana button | New Mexico button | Montana button | Wyoming button |

Parking lot sealant ups cancer risk

Toxic dust from coal tar sealcoat invades homes, watersheds.

More than half the apartments with the coal tar-sealed lots contained dust with levels of PAHs that would increase the risk of cancer if ingested by preschoolers, the researchers said. They came to this conclusion by comparing their results to a 2008 study that estimated those risks based on lab tests on animals. The increased risk means one additional child in 10,000 would develop cancer if exposed to that level of toxins over a lifetime.

Although adults are at risk from toxic pollutants in house dust, young children are especially vulnerable, studies have shown. That’s because they have a higher metabolic rate, they get a bigger dose per pound of body weight, their organs are still developing and they play on or near floors where carpets concentrate and retain toxics. Stanford University researchers have recorded children putting their hands on contaminated surfaces, such as floors, and then into their mouths up to 60 times an hour.

The new research on parking lots is important because scientists have been trying to figure out the sources of PAHs for years, said Ted Schettler, science director of the Collaborative on Health and the Environment, a group of medical professionals trying to reduce environment-related diseases.

“This parking lot (research) is very interesting because it could be there’s a large contributor out there that people didn’t know about,” said Schettler, who was not involved in the research.

Components of coal tar escape parking lots and driveways and get into the environment, causing stunted growth in creatures that live in streams, scientists have shown. Research also reveals that the chemicals in coal tar kill tadpoles, cause tumors on fish and eliminate whole species of tiny aquatic creatures near the base of the food chain.

One congressman, Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, is calling for a nationwide ban of the coal tar pavement sealants, which are applied by big contractors as well as operators with little more than a truck and a spray tank.

Not only was the toxic house dust found in apartment units surrounded by paved parking lots, but USGS researchers also measured contamination in dust from apartment house parking lots and the driveways of a few single family homes. The most dangerous coal tar component — a PAH chemical called benzo[a]pyrene — was found in driveway dust at two suburban single family homes at thousands of times the level that would trigger a cleanup at a toxic-waste site.

The United States has no standard for benzo[a]pyrene in house dust, but Germany has an official guideline of 10 parts of the chemical for every 1 million parts of dust, which it says is necessary “to avoid adverse health effects.” In the USGS tests of apartments near coal-tar lots, a third of the apartments showed levels of the toxic chemical exceeding that standard. Some PAHs, including benzo[a]pyrene, are “highly potent” when it comes to causing cancer, according to the EPA.

The EPA did not provide a representative to discuss the new findings with InvestigateWest, despite repeated requests. Rep. Doggett began asking for EPA action in 2003. In 2009 the agency launched research on coal tar sealants that is expected to be completed this year. In a July letter to Doggett and answers to written questions from InvestigateWest last month, the agency did not offer an explanation for the delay.

While there are no reliable estimates of the total amount of the coal tar sealants applied to pavement nationwide, the industry has said that some 59 million gallons — enough to fill nearly 90 Olympic-sized swimming pools — are applied in Texas each year. In the much-smaller watershed surrounding New York City’s harbor, something like 1.4 million gallons is estimated to be applied annually, according to a 2007 study for the New York Academy of Sciences.

Local governments in Austin, Washington, D.C. and the county that includes Madison, Wis., have banned pavement sealants containing coal tar after findings of PAHs in local waterways. In its place, they rely on the second main type of sealant used in the U.S., which is asphalt based.

About the author

Robert McClure, Investigate West is a Pulitzer Prize finalist. After an academic year on the prestigious Knight-Wallace journalism fellowship, I realized that I needed to move West if I wanted to cover the really big environmental stories. So I left my native Florida, spending my 40th birthday — my second weekend as a Westerner — camping amid the snow on Washington’s Mount Adams. During my two decades on the environment beat, I prodded officials until they launched major ecosystem restoration projects in Puget Sound and the Florida Everglades. The latter remains the largest ecosystem restoration attempted on the planet so far. At the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, I was the backbone of five major projects, including one that uncovered a glaring loophole in the Endangered Species Act. I am a board member at the Society of Environmental Journalists and have won a number of awards, including the John B. Oakes Award for Distinguished Environmental Journalism. Contact me.

  • envrguru
    Mr. McClure - You did a wonderful job presenting the argument. Lance65 is nothing more than a lobbiest for coal tar, lining her own pockets (Anne LeHuray) to promote this toxic waste. An army is mounting against the coal tar seal coat industry and they are on their way out the door.
  • lance65
    The story that Mr. McClure wrote was filled with so many glaring errors and is so one sided, it leaves me speechless. I really am at a loss as to where to start.

    I am curious to know if Mr.McClure actually researched to see if there was another viewpoint to this story?

    I wonder if Mr. McClure asked USGS how they distinguished PAH from sealer products vs. the thousand of other sources of PAHs (natural or combustion related)? Did Mr. McClure happen to mention that the study with the children was the first of its kind. I don't think so. Did Mr. McClure happen to mention that a typical person ingests PAHs on a daily basis? I wonder if Mr McClure mentioned that combustion related sources are the largest contributor to PAHs in the environment?

    I am curious to know if Mr. McClure was perhaps motivated to write such a sensational story to help get his new venture Investigate West off the ground?

    I would like to assist Mr. McClure if I may. For those who are wondering if there is an opposing viewpoint, go to http://www.truthaboutcoaltar.com/.
  • dcjay
    Coal tar sealant "is used in all 50 states" -- maybe, but is banned here in the District of Columbia since last year. There's a $2,500 per day fine if you use it: http://ddoe.dc.gov/ddoe/cwp/view,A,1209,Q,50053....

    nice story, robert -- jay
  • lance65
    Tar sealants are not used in all 50 states. Another error by Mr. McClure.

    The DC ban was a sham and a joke. DC paid for a study and they found that sealer was not a major source of PAHs, but they banned it anyway. Why did they waste all that money on the study.
  • Thanks for sharing this info, dcjay.

    Do you know if the sealcoat ban in the District was a result of citizen advocacy or an ordinance crafted from within by a council member?
  • dcjay
    I don't know -- probably both. Now the D.C. city council is considering a bill that would ban a host of chemicals, including bpa. These actions can be significant because we don't have a state or state legislature; that role is filled here by the city council.
  • Thanks for the heads up. Sounds like folks concerned about coal tar and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons should be keeping an eye on the D.C. City Council for pointers on how to proceed with banning or regulating these carcinogens in their own communities.
  • lance65
    Sealers are not the problem. Combustion sources are. I kind of doubt that DC will be banning cars anytime soon.
blog comments powered by Disqus