But a spokeswoman for a trade group of companies that apply the coal tar sealants said research has not been comprehensive enough to justify such bans. Anne P. LeHuray, director of the Pavement Coatings Technology Council, said people who advocate bans are looking for a “magic bullet” to solve a complicated problem.

She points out that cancer-causing chemicals contained in the pavement sealants also get into cities and suburbs from a number of other sources, including motor oil, vehicle exhaust and tires.

“Right now the research is not that convincing that this is that important a source of PAHs relative to all the other sources that are out there,” LeHuray said. “They didn’t look at all the potential sources.”

A tiny toxic creek
The path that led to the discovery of the toxic dirt inside Americans’ homes traces back to a tiny creek in Austin, Texas.

When researcher Mahler saw test results on dirt scooped from the bottom of a tributary of Barton Creek in 2001, the pollution readings were so high she felt certain someone had made an error. The concentrations found in a drainage ditch leading from a parking lot to Barton Creek were higher than levels typically measured at toxic-waste sites — higher even than Boston’s notoriously polluted Charles River, where PAHs are listed as among the “contaminants of concern” on that major industrial waterway.

Further testing showed the high readings were accurate. But what was the source?

Barton Creek feeds Barton Springs, a public bathing site cherished by Austin residents because it offers a cool respite from tyrannically hot Texas summers. Levels of PAHs measured in Barton Springs were high enough that the Austin American-Statesman dispatched reporters to track down what was suspected to be a hidden toxic waste dump.

On Aug. 16, 2002, Tom Bashara of Austin’s Watershed Protection Department went to check spots along Barton Creek where city biologists had pinpointed extremely high levels of PAHs.

“I spent a good half an hour walking around looking for cars gushing out fluid or someone dumping stuff, but none of that was happening,” Bashara recalls.

He did notice that the parking lot was rich black color. Then he noticed the deep black color had been rubbed off by cars’ tires in some places. So it was newly sealed.

He moved on to other pollution hotspots on the creek, where he found more parking lots colored the same deep, rich black.

“That’s when it dawned on me: There’s some connection between the sealcoat and the hotspots,” Bashara said.

Story index

  • dcjay

    Coal tar sealant “is used in all 50 states” — maybe, but is banned here in the District of Columbia since last year. There's a $2,500 per day fine if you use it: http://ddoe.dc.gov/ddoe/cwp/view,A,1209,Q,50053….

    nice story, robert — jay

  • http://www.westerncitizen.com Wendy Norris

    Thanks for sharing this info, dcjay.

    Do you know if the sealcoat ban in the District was a result of citizen advocacy or an ordinance crafted from within by a council member?

  • dcjay

    I don't know — probably both. Now the D.C. city council is considering a bill that would ban a host of chemicals, including bpa. These actions can be significant because we don't have a state or state legislature; that role is filled here by the city council.

  • http://www.westerncitizen.com Wendy Norris

    Thanks for the heads up. Sounds like folks concerned about coal tar and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons should be keeping an eye on the D.C. City Council for pointers on how to proceed with banning or regulating these carcinogens in their own communities.

  • lance65

    The story that Mr. McClure wrote was filled with so many glaring errors and is so one sided, it leaves me speechless. I really am at a loss as to where to start.

    I am curious to know if Mr.McClure actually researched to see if there was another viewpoint to this story?

    I wonder if Mr. McClure asked USGS how they distinguished PAH from sealer products vs. the thousand of other sources of PAHs (natural or combustion related)? Did Mr. McClure happen to mention that the study with the children was the first of its kind. I don't think so. Did Mr. McClure happen to mention that a typical person ingests PAHs on a daily basis? I wonder if Mr McClure mentioned that combustion related sources are the largest contributor to PAHs in the environment?

    I am curious to know if Mr. McClure was perhaps motivated to write such a sensational story to help get his new venture Investigate West off the ground?

    I would like to assist Mr. McClure if I may. For those who are wondering if there is an opposing viewpoint, go to http://www.truthaboutcoaltar.com/.

  • lance65

    Tar sealants are not used in all 50 states. Another error by Mr. McClure.

    The DC ban was a sham and a joke. DC paid for a study and they found that sealer was not a major source of PAHs, but they banned it anyway. Why did they waste all that money on the study.

  • lance65

    Sealers are not the problem. Combustion sources are. I kind of doubt that DC will be banning cars anytime soon.

  • envrguru

    Mr. McClure – You did a wonderful job presenting the argument. Lance65 is nothing more than a lobbiest for coal tar, lining her own pockets (Anne LeHuray) to promote this toxic waste. An army is mounting against the coal tar seal coat industry and they are on their way out the door.

  • http://www.westerncitizen.com Wendy Norris

    Approve.

    Wendy Norris
    Investigative reporter. Freelance muckraker. Rabble-rousing editor.

    mobile: 970-222-8409
    web: http://www.westerncitizen.com
    social media: card.ly/wendynorris | contxts wendynorris to 50500

  • http://www.westerncitizen.com Wendy Norris

    Approve.

    Wendy Norris
    Investigative reporter. Freelance muckraker. Rabble-rousing editor.

    mobile: 970-222-8409
    web: http://www.westerncitizen.com
    social media: card.ly/wendynorris | contxts wendynorris to 50500

MEDIA PARTNERS