NEWS FEEDS: West button | Colorado button | Idaho button | Montana button | New Mexico button | Montana button | Wyoming button |

Parking lot sealant ups cancer risk

Toxic dust from coal tar sealcoat invades homes, watersheds.

Tadpoles in toxic Dixie Cups

A series of scientific studies followed.

In one, Mahler and her colleagues demonstrated that the particles of dirt in water running off a parking lot with coal tar sealant had PAH levels about 65 times higher than those from water running off lots where no sealant had been applied.

In another, tadpoles were put into containers with high, medium and low levels of pollution. The tadpoles in the cups with the highest concentration all died within six days, said Mateo Scoggins, a City of Austin biologist. The ones exposed to medium and low levels of PAHs, comparable to the concentration in Barton Creek, showed stunted growth.

Researchers from the city of Austin and Texas Tech University also looked at how the PAH pollution was affecting life in the creeks in Austin, and found a reduced number of insects available for birds, frogs and other creatures to eat.

That, said Scoggins, indicated that “there is more of a problem . . . than we thought.”

Sweeping the parking lot

Scientists from the USGS Texas Water Science Center involved in the Barton Creek findings measured pollution in lakes around the country, noting an increase in PAHs. In the next phase of their inquiry, they swept up dust in parking lots in Seattle, Portland, Salt Lake City, Minneapolis, Austin, Chicago, Detroit, Washington, D.C. and New Haven, Conn.

Coal tar sealants are used predominantly in the East, and that’s where the highest PAH readings were found — roughly 1,000 times higher than those in the West, where it’s much more likely that a driveway or parking lot will be coated with an asphalt sealant.

That figures, because the levels of PAHs in coal tar sealants is about 1,000 times what it is in asphalt sealants, researchers have found. One parking lot near Seattle had high pollution levels, while the other Western readings were relatively low.

The big question is how do parking lots figure into the big picture on these growing levels of PAH contamination?

U.S.G.S. researchers, led by hydrologist Peter Van Metre, expect they will soon have an answer. Research expected to be finalized in coming months will analyze the “fingerprint” of PAHs in various lakes to determine the source of the chemicals.

“We’re able to isolate the (parking lot) sealcoat in some of these settings as the only really logical source,” Van Metre said.

The “poster child,” he said, may be Lake in the Hills, a town northwest of Chicago. In the last two decades it went from a small town amid cornfields to a sprawling suburb dotted with big box stores. Roughly 40 percent of the paved areas that drain into the town’s manmade lake had been covered with sealcoating. PAH pollution levels in the lake went up tenfold, Van Metre said, and the contamination included the two homes with PAH levels in their driveways at thousands of times the amount that would trigger a toxic-waste site cleanup.

About the author

Robert McClure, Investigate West is a Pulitzer Prize finalist. After an academic year on the prestigious Knight-Wallace journalism fellowship, I realized that I needed to move West if I wanted to cover the really big environmental stories. So I left my native Florida, spending my 40th birthday — my second weekend as a Westerner — camping amid the snow on Washington’s Mount Adams. During my two decades on the environment beat, I prodded officials until they launched major ecosystem restoration projects in Puget Sound and the Florida Everglades. The latter remains the largest ecosystem restoration attempted on the planet so far. At the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, I was the backbone of five major projects, including one that uncovered a glaring loophole in the Endangered Species Act. I am a board member at the Society of Environmental Journalists and have won a number of awards, including the John B. Oakes Award for Distinguished Environmental Journalism. Contact me.

  • envrguru
    Mr. McClure - You did a wonderful job presenting the argument. Lance65 is nothing more than a lobbiest for coal tar, lining her own pockets (Anne LeHuray) to promote this toxic waste. An army is mounting against the coal tar seal coat industry and they are on their way out the door.
  • lance65
    The story that Mr. McClure wrote was filled with so many glaring errors and is so one sided, it leaves me speechless. I really am at a loss as to where to start.

    I am curious to know if Mr.McClure actually researched to see if there was another viewpoint to this story?

    I wonder if Mr. McClure asked USGS how they distinguished PAH from sealer products vs. the thousand of other sources of PAHs (natural or combustion related)? Did Mr. McClure happen to mention that the study with the children was the first of its kind. I don't think so. Did Mr. McClure happen to mention that a typical person ingests PAHs on a daily basis? I wonder if Mr McClure mentioned that combustion related sources are the largest contributor to PAHs in the environment?

    I am curious to know if Mr. McClure was perhaps motivated to write such a sensational story to help get his new venture Investigate West off the ground?

    I would like to assist Mr. McClure if I may. For those who are wondering if there is an opposing viewpoint, go to http://www.truthaboutcoaltar.com/.
  • dcjay
    Coal tar sealant "is used in all 50 states" -- maybe, but is banned here in the District of Columbia since last year. There's a $2,500 per day fine if you use it: http://ddoe.dc.gov/ddoe/cwp/view,A,1209,Q,50053....

    nice story, robert -- jay
  • lance65
    Tar sealants are not used in all 50 states. Another error by Mr. McClure.

    The DC ban was a sham and a joke. DC paid for a study and they found that sealer was not a major source of PAHs, but they banned it anyway. Why did they waste all that money on the study.
  • Thanks for sharing this info, dcjay.

    Do you know if the sealcoat ban in the District was a result of citizen advocacy or an ordinance crafted from within by a council member?
  • dcjay
    I don't know -- probably both. Now the D.C. city council is considering a bill that would ban a host of chemicals, including bpa. These actions can be significant because we don't have a state or state legislature; that role is filled here by the city council.
  • Thanks for the heads up. Sounds like folks concerned about coal tar and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons should be keeping an eye on the D.C. City Council for pointers on how to proceed with banning or regulating these carcinogens in their own communities.
  • lance65
    Sealers are not the problem. Combustion sources are. I kind of doubt that DC will be banning cars anytime soon.
blog comments powered by Disqus