by | 11 March 2010

The pushing match between Amazon.com, its Colorado marketing affiliates and the state already has caused some bruises, and now grassroots groups are shoving back.

Amazon fired its marketing affiliates in Colorado earlier this week in what’s being called retaliation for a new e-commerce law signed by Governor Ritter, which seeks to require Amazon and other online retailers to notify customers that they owe state sales tax on their purchases. Now, the drama is heating up with grassroots groups calling for a boycott of the online retailer.

Alec Harris, an analyst with the Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, supports the online tax law and the boycott, saying Amazon’s claim the new requirements are “unduly burdensome” is an overstatement.

“This bill is just asking Amazon to inform their consumers — it strikes me that that’s sort of on par with, and maybe even a little bit below, what a lot of the retailers are already doing.”

Other retailers, such as Best Buy and Target, operate both online and retail stores in Colorado and collect sales tax from both types of transactions, Harris points out. Republican lawmakers in Denver have called for a repeal of the law, but supporters say that would amount to appeasing a bully. Harris hopes the boycott will send a simple message to Amazon.

“This is the law; this is what a good majority of retailers already do; we think it’s only fair for Colorado businesses that you do the same.”

An Amazon spokesperson would not comment on the reason for cutting ties with Colorado affiliates, but said they see the new law as a way to pressure online retailers into eventually collecting sales tax voluntarily.

Listen to the Colorado News Connection podcast by Eric Mack.

Story index

  • http://www.westerncitizen.com Wendy Norris

    To add a little context: We're not talking chump change here.

    (1) The nonpartisan Colorado Legislative Council indicated in the fiscal note attached to HB10-1193 that the state could reap up to $4.7 million next year in previously uncollected e-commerce taxes.

    See 1193sfinappapp_01.pdf for the financial break down.

    (2) As I note in today's Daily Digit, states and municipalities are leaving up to $12.65 billion on the tax from uncollected e-commerce sales.

  • http://www.dianahsieh.com/ Diana Hsieh

    I'm a Colorado Amazon Associate sickened by this whole fiasco with the cancellation of the accounts of Colorado Associates. But contrary to the claims of many on the left, Amazon is NOT to blame.

    The Colorado government — our legislators and governor — created this mess by its imposition of an “Amazon Tax” with HB 1193. Given its Colorado-based affiliates, that law would have crippled Amazon with an onerous and expensive confusion of red tape, plus a crazy patchwork of local taxes. The only way for Amazon to extricate itself from that nightmare was to terminate the Affiliate Program.

    I've posted about it to my blog:

    http://www.dianahsieh.com/blog/2010/03/colorado…

    And Ari Armstrong has a long post here, with some excellent analysis of the law:

    http://blog.ariarmstrong.com/2010/03/stop-amazo…

    I've also created a super-quick web site. The “Amazon Tax” must be repealed!

    http://www.RepealTheAmazonTax.com/

    If you want to help pressure the Colorado legislature to repeal this awful law, please join the low-volume e-mail list, NoAmazonTax:

    http://groups.google.com/group/noamazontax

    Please spread the word!

    – DMH

    Diana Hsieh (Ph.D, Philosophy, CU Boulder)
    E-mail: diana@dianahsieh.com
    NoodleFood: http://www.dianahsieh.com/blog
    NoodleCast: http://www.dianahsieh.com/cast

  • http://www.westerncitizen.com Wendy Norris

    To add a little context: We're not talking chump change here.

    (1) The nonpartisan Colorado Legislative Council indicated in the fiscal note attached to HB10-1193 that the state could reap up to $4.7 million next year in previously uncollected e-commerce taxes.

    See 1193sfinappapp_01.pdf for the financial break down.

    (2) As I note in today's Daily Digit, states and municipalities are leaving up to $12.65 billion on the tax from uncollected e-commerce sales.

  • http://www.dianahsieh.com/ Diana Hsieh

    I'm a Colorado Amazon Associate sickened by this whole fiasco with the cancellation of the accounts of Colorado Associates. But contrary to the claims of many on the left, Amazon is NOT to blame.

    The Colorado government — our legislators and governor — created this mess by its imposition of an “Amazon Tax” with HB 1193. Given its Colorado-based affiliates, that law would have crippled Amazon with an onerous and expensive confusion of red tape, plus a crazy patchwork of local taxes. The only way for Amazon to extricate itself from that nightmare was to terminate the Affiliate Program.

    I've posted about it to my blog:

    http://www.dianahsieh.com/blog/2010/03/colorado…

    And Ari Armstrong has a long post here, with some excellent analysis of the law:

    http://blog.ariarmstrong.com/2010/03/stop-amazo…

    I've also created a super-quick web site. The “Amazon Tax” must be repealed!

    http://www.RepealTheAmazonTax.com/

    If you want to help pressure the Colorado legislature to repeal this awful law, please join the low-volume e-mail list, NoAmazonTax:

    http://groups.google.com/group/noamazontax

    Please spread the word!

    – DMH

    Diana Hsieh (Ph.D, Philosophy, CU Boulder)
    E-mail: diana@dianahsieh.com
    NoodleFood: http://www.dianahsieh.com/blog
    NoodleCast: http://www.dianahsieh.com/cast

MEDIA PARTNERS